For me currently conversions fails with error message “Wrong File Format”, for details please see GitHub.
Tag Archives: converter
Many old type Firefox addons lost!
“Houston, we have had a problem” — AMO Browsing for SeaMonkey and addon converter have become useless — more or less 😡
For details see Bug 1517828 – Firefox add-ons no longer available for SeaMonkey.
This means that lots of add-ons which where compatible with SeaMonkey after conversion no longer can be installed.
We will need the FF-addons without Webextensions successor versions on the new addon repository!
AMO Browsing for SeaMonkey: New Version 0.9.17rc1 with enhancements tested successfully
After repair version 0.9.16 Isaac Schemm now created a new version 0.9.17 with some enhancements. RC is available for testing on github, release will be available on AMO, soon,
I did several tests with unzipped installer of official en-US SeaMonkey 2.53a1 (NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:56.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/56.0 Build 20170706013410 (Default Classic Theme) on German WIN7 64bit and checked various functions, which were broken before. For these tests I used some Add-Ons from compatibility list. If you want to do tests directly from AMO, you will have to select an Other Application like Firefox; from the AMO SeaMonkey Area search will only show add-ons which are compatible with SeaMonkey. The FF-AMO-Area already show the new AMO design.
I did my tests from AMO FF Area.
- 👍 Suppress”FF-Only” button, tested with BlockSite from Search Results list.
- ✅ [+ Add To FF] or similar button will be suppressed in search result list (which shows old AMO design) an replaced by “Convert this add-on here” – links.
- ✅ On add-on download page [+ Add To FF] button is replaced by Convert Add-on link.
- ✅ Conversion link in added explication text works fine
- 👍 Useful Text for add-ons built with WebExtensions, which can’t be used with SeaMonkey and which can’t be converted with Add-On-Converter — tested with LEO Dictionaries 3.0 (and YouTube a MP3 1.0.6)
- ✅ Adds explication to AMO web page for add-on
- ✅ check previous versions – link works fine
- ✅ Conversion link on previous versions page (replaces [+ Add to Firefox]) works fine
- ✅ check previous versions – link works fine
- ✅ Adds explication to AMO web page for add-on
- 👍 Find SeaMonkey Version of add-on — Tested with Lightning 5.4
- ✅ SeaMonkey version of this add-on exists!– link is available and works fine, finds SM version
Did I forget something? All functions I tested worked fine
@Isaac: Thank you for great work.
AMO Browsing for SeaMonkey: repaired Version 0.9.16a1 available for tests
Unfortunately after several changes on AMO website the add-on tool AMO Browsing for SeaMonkey did not work any longer. For Details please see “Bug 1389022 – “AMO Browsing for SeaMonkey” does not work any longer“!
But there are great news,
I did several tests with unzipped installer of official en-US SeaMonkey 2.53a1 (NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:56.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/56.0 Build 20170706013410 (Default Classic Theme) on German WIN7 64bit and checked various functions, which were broken before. For these tests I used some Add-Ons from compatibility list.
- 👍 Replace “FF-Only” button by [Check if SeaMonkey version is available] — Tested with BlockSite
- ✅ SM button is available
- ✅ After search focus returns to FF add-on because no SM version of add-on does exist
- ✅ Conversion link in added explication text works fine
- 👍 Useful Text for add-ons built with WebExtensions, which can’t be used with SeaMonkey and which can’t be converted with Add-On-Converter — tested with LEO Dictionaries 3.0
- ✅ Adds explication to AMO web page for add-on
- ✅ check previous versions – link works fine
- ✅ Conversion link on previous versions page (replaces [+ Add to Firefox] works fine
- ✅ check previous versions – link works fine
- ✅ Adds explication to AMO web page for add-on
- 👍 Find SeaMonkey Version of add-on — Tested with ChatZilla
- ✅ [Check if SeaMonkey version is available] – button works fine, finds SM version
- ✅On add-on web page for SeaMonkey version [+ Add to SeaMonkey] button as expected
Did I forget something? All functions I tested worked fine
@Isaac: Thank you for great work.
AMO Browsing for SeaMonkey: Versions update
After a minimum test (installs on Server-Installation of unofficial (by FRG) en-US SeaMonkey 2.50a1 (NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:53.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/53.0 Build 20161127221846 (Default Classic Theme) on German WIN7 64bit, converts CoLT (compatible after conversion due to compatibility list), CoLT passed some tests without problems) I extended compatible SeaMonkey version range for AMO Browsing for SeaMonkey 0.9.15 to SeaMonkey 2.22 … 2.50.*.
Qwant search engine for SeaMonkey
Today via Planet Mozilla (de) in Sören Hentzschel’s Blog I heard about search engine Qwant for the first time. Qwant promises a completely “different” internet search:
- No filter bubbles
- no Tracking–Cookies
- Protection of users’ privacy
AMO Browsing for SeaMonkey 0.9.12 is on AMO
We now are going to get listed the great tool on AMO, review will happen within few days. Can you please contribute additional test results (here as comments) whether AMO Browsing for SeaMonkey 0.9.12 also works with other Operation Systems (Linux, MAC)? Before you type a comment about a bug or possible enhancement you found please read known issues on Github.
Additionally some more feedback concerning compatibility of converted add-ons would be great, please use feedback e-mail-form from Download-Page.
New: AMO-Browsing-for-SeaMonkey 0.9.11
The new version of this add-on has been created for a new attempt to get the add-on to AMO (Bug 1224520 – Upload “AMO Browsing for SeaMonkey” to AMO), additionally an external style sheet that should make future changes a bit easier. Continue reading
Enhancements for AMO-Browsing-Add-On
AMO-Browsing-Add-On is available, works fine and is a great relief for everybody who uses add-ons which are not compatible for SeaMonkey from the scratch. Continue reading
New Style at AMO
As announced we now have a new Style on AMO. The contrast in the upper blue area now is some better than during my test, and the footer does no longer have blue background with very bad contrast. Real progress or only new to have something new 😉
— what is your opinion? Continue reading